If you’re now represented by a public defender or from alternative defense counsel, the Judge is unlikely to give your request for one more court-appointed lawyer. It’s not unusual for defendants to disagree with their court-appointed lawyers, and these disagreements seldom rise to a level requiring a change of counsel. Nonetheless, in some cases the discussions between a client and his lawyer can harm the attorney-client connection to this extent that it’s not possible for the lawyer to effectively represent his client.
The factors are different for somebody represented with a private lawyer. A private lawyer could be fired by his customer at any moment. After shooting his lawyer, a defendant could employ another lawyer. However, several problems arise: first, the financial strain of paying two lawyers, and secondly, if the substitution is beneficial to the defendant.
I often get approached by individuals trying to fire their lawyer and replace him with a various personal criminal lawyer. But, I regularly explain to these potential customers that a new lawyer could possibly be harmful to their situation depending upon where they’re in the procedure. For instance, shooting your New York criminal attorney weekly before a jury trial might not make sense since the Judge might not give your new lawyer a continuance to become ready; along with your new lawyer will need that excess time so as to effectively represent you. Additionally, individuals who feel frustrated with their lawyers and believe that their lawyers aren’t doing a good job might not comprehend the caliber of the job their lawyer has done since their lawyer hasn’t taken the opportunity to fully and in detail explain to them what is going on with their situation. Obviously, a failure to adequately communicate with and inform that a customer is in and of itself a critical concern and puts into question the efficiency of the lawyer in his representation.